Grimrock

Whether or not it is bad design is debatable and subjective but this is indeed the intended design. The goal for the combat in Grimrock was a game of rhythm, tactics and reaction instead of trying realistically simulate a group of four individuals But I felt the rhythm froze when it's inevitable ho...

I thought this element is one of the worst designs in the game. We do have information from philosophy stone, it's said elements oppose one another, apparently not this one. No doubt it’s aeriform and immaterial, seriously, does it have to be like this?! Not to speak of casting the spell, another PI...

This game is vastly improved in all areas, but there is miscellanea that pokes the eye... 1. Charged weapons Now: Charged weapons consume energy as well as one charge. This is a absurd idea, making any charged weapon like garbage in the battle. Both waste your time and energy. Maybe the team doesn'...

Literally yes it dual-wielding two weapons at the same time but not the attack. What I expected is not to click both instead of clicking any of it to do the trick. :cry: Well that was a wrong expectation then. My opinion, as a whole, it's just like holding a single weapon with penalty. Wrong. Try t...

Komag wrote:I like it a lot, because you have an additional attack in your round of attacks to keep an enemy stunned. When timed right, its a beautiful thing

not to mention missed the moment, still it's the beauty of this game, quite enjoy it

Technically it's not dual attack at all, not to mention the penalty. Why we have to click twice instead of one?? There must be a way to remedy it. The skill allowes you to "Dual Wield". Any "Dual Attack" has to be done by you clicking both weapons and that's fine as it is. Sorry...

To be frank, I'm disappointed about this skill and the way it's performed.
I know every weapon has different cold-down to strike again.
Technically it's not dual attack at all, not to mention the penalty.
Why we have to click twice instead of one?? There must be a way to remedy it.